A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Visual Map Navigation

View in Semantic Map View in A-Z Index

Related content in other products

International Heat Transfer Conference Digital Library International Centre for Heat and Mass Transfer Digital Library Begell House Journals Annual Review of Heat Transfer

Radiative equilibrium in plane-parallel layer

DOI: 10.1615/thermopedia.000132


Radiative Equilibrium in a Plane-Parallel Layer

Leonid A. Dombrovsky

Following from: P1 approximation of the spherical harmonics method, The simplest approximations of double spherical harmonics, Solutions for one-dimensional radiative transfer problems

Leading to: Radiative boundary layer

We will consider a situation in which the thermal radiation is the only mode of heat transfer in an absorbing and scattering medium between two flat parallel walls with different temperatures. Since there is no heat transfer by convection and conduction, one can speak about the radiative equilibrium in the medium, and the energy equation has the following form:

(1)

where q is the integral thermal radiation flux and d is the distance between the walls.

First, we give a formulation of the radiative equilibrium problem in the case of a gray medium and gray isotropically radiating walls. The radiative transfer equation (RTE) for the integral radiation intensity and appropriate boundary conditions are

(2a)
(2b)
(2c)

where τ = β z is the optical coordinate; τ0 = β d is the optical thickness of the medium layer; Tw1, Tw2 are the temperatures of the walls; εw1, εw2 are the hemispherical emissivities of the walls; for specular reflection; and for the diffuse (isotropic) reflection of the radiation by the walls. The radiation flux is defined as follows:

(3)

In the above statement, the radiative equilibrium problem has no analytical solution. For isotropic scattering, the integration of Eq. (2a) with regard to Eqs. (1) and (3) leads to the following relations:

(4a)
(4b)

The first of these equations is the radiation energy conservation for an arbitrary gray medium; the second one is true only for isotropic scattering. One can see that the solution does not depend on the medium albedo if the scattering is isotropic. The relations, which are similar to Eq. (4), can also be obtained for the transport approximation of the arbitrary scattering function. It is sufficient to redefine optical coordinate τ through transport extinction coefficient βtr instead of the ordinary extinction coefficient β. Therefore, the solution to the radiative equilibrium problem is technically identical for the nonscattering medium and the isotropically scattering medium and in the transport approximation for arbitrary anisotropic scattering.

Heaslet and Warming (1965) have found the exact solution for the problem considered at an arbitrary optical thickness. This solution was expressed in terms of tabulated functions. A more complicated problem of radiative equilibrium in a medium with linear anisotropic scattering was considered by Dombrovsky (1974) and by Modest and Azad (1980). The following analytical solution in the DP1 approximation was derived by Dombrovsky (1974):

(5a)
(5b)
(5c)

Here, a10w1w2) and a20w1w2) are the functions equal to zero at εw1 = εw2 = 1. In the diffusion approximation, dimensionless functions Q and θ can be written in the form:

(6a)

where τtr = βtrz, τtr0 = βtrd, and

(6b)

Here, Nappr = 0 corresponds to the DP0 approximation; Nappr = 1 corresponds to the P1 approximation; the value N mod = 0 corresponds to Marshak’s boundary condition; and N mod = 1 corresponds to Pomraning’s condition. One can see that θ(0) ≠ 1 and θ(τtr0) ≠ 0. This means that the medium temperature near the walls does not coincide with the wall temperature except in the limiting case of τtr0 → ∞. This effect, called the radiation slip, has been discussed in some detail by Deissler (1964) and by Sparrow and Cess (1978).

In the case of isotropic scattering, the results obtained by use of the approximate differential approximations can be compared with the exact solution. One can see in Fig. 1 and Table 1 that the P1 approximation is better for the optically thick layers, but DP0 is better for the optically thin layers of the medium. The modification P1m gives the same error as P1 at large optical thickness τtr0, but at τtr0 < 0.6 the error of P1m is much higher (not to mention that the obvious result of Q = 1 at τtr0 = 0 is not obtained). The accuracy of the P1 approximation in radiative equilibrium calculations for anisotropically scattering medium was estimated by Modest and Azad (1980). The comparison of P1 with the exact solution for linear anisotropic scattering showed the same error level as that in the isotropic case.

Figure1. Dimensionless radiative flux in radiative equilibrium for medium layer with isotropic scattering: (1) P1, (2) DP0, (3) DP1, and (4) exact solution.

Table1. Dimensionless radiation flux in the radiative equilibrium: Solution for plane-parallel layer of isotropically scattering medium

τ0 P1 P1m DP0 DP1 Exact solution(by Heaslet and Warming, 1965)
0.1 0.9302 0.8271 0.9091 0.9127 0.9157
0.4 0.7692 0.6974 0.7143 0.7401 0.7458
1 0.5714 0.5308 0.5000 0.5510 0.5532
2 0.4000 0.3796 0.3333 0.3896 0.3900
3 0.3077 0.2955 0.2500 0.3015 0.3016
10 0.1176 0.1158 0.0909 0.1167 0.1167

As one could expect, the DP1 approximation is much more accurate than the P1 or DP0 approximation. According to Table 1, the deviation of DP1 from the exact solution for isotropic scattering does not exceed 1%. At large optical thickness, the solution for linear anisotropic scattering (5b) gives the following expression for dimensionless radiation flux:

(7)

The exact solution obtained by Heaslet and Warming (1965) at μ = 0 gives a similar result:

(8)

One can see from Eq. (14) that transport approximation is a good approach even for linear anisotropic scattering in the case of an optically thick medium layer.

The computational results presented above allow formulating this general conclusion: in radiative equilibrium, as in thermal radiation of an isothermal layer, the diffusion approximation gives satisfactory results for radiation flux, and the transport approximation of the scattering function is a fairly good model for the scattering anisotropy description.

REFERENCES

Deissler, R. G., Diffusion approximation for thermal radiation in gases with jump boundary conditions, ASME J. Heat Transfer, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 240-246, 1964.

Dombrovsky, L. A., Radiative equilibrium in a plane-parallel layer of absorbing and scattering medium, Fluid Dyn., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 663-666, 1974.

Heaslet, M. A. and Warming, R. F., Radiative transport and wall temperature slip in an absorbing planar medium, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 979-994, 1965.

Modest, M. F. and Azad, F. H., The differential approximation for radiative transfer in an emitting, absorbing, and anisotropically scattering medium, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 117-120, 1980.

Sparrow, E. M. and Cess, R. D., Radiation Heat Transfer, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

Number of views: 17100 Article added: 7 September 2010 Article last modified: 18 March 2011 © Copyright 2010-2017 Back to top